Sometimes I wonder what a world without degradation and objectification would be like. Would the children of the next generation have more balanced and equal relationships with each other? Would women truly be judged on their abilities rather than the way they look? Would girl children run free, not restricted by “manners” or shoes not made for running in? Would the symptoms of our repression be considered amusing cultural artifacts kept in museums, parents and grandparents telling their children “this is what it was like back then…before we were free..”?
I don’t really know what the future will be like. But I now consider our world to be some dystopian, oppressive nightmare, where the world doesn’t respect the planet, where pole dancing and stripping is somehow the height of ‘empowerment’ and we live in a climate of terror and globalisation. A place where, if I try to criticise things that are truly sexist, racist or homophobic, I am told it is “ironic”. I am told to ‘lighten up’ and this makes me feel truly angry and disempowered. Told that there are more important things to be angry about. Is it not powerful to be aware and passionate and angry? Is it not powerful to be aware of oppression and to criticise it and try to change it?
I feel that we are living in a world where men’s voices are always more important. Where if there is a man in the room, people will talk me down or talk over me before I have finished talking. We’re not post-patriarchy yet and still our era is considered ‘post-feminist’.
So the real agenda has stepped out and we’re confronted with porn, and raunch culture, and paedophilia and rape and violence, all that was simmering below the surface when feminism was more visible. The backlash is still happening, and I feel really sad when I’m confronted with people who truly think they are in the right when they can’t see the reality that is happening out there.
History denies Herstory – entire sections of women’s history is glossed over, warped and damaged by misinformation and cultural suppositions. The Suffragettes are now considered ‘female terrorists’ (yes, there are some articles around) and the second wave are thought of as ‘man-hating, bra-burning, hairy feminists’.
Why? Is our society so woman-hating that it considers the justified rage of women just impotent screaming? Anything done for women is now considered HIStory and in the past. Apparently, we can move on now, we’re equal, we can do whatever we want. This is the only ironic ‘joke’ I know.
Our climate is all about male sexuality and porn. It denies that women’s sexuality isn’t an extension of male sexuality. Apparently, Porn is now Sex: where teenagers get their education, and believe that all women will act like porn stars. That it’s acceptable to rape a woman and film it and distribute it around to your classmates. No, porn is not the cause but it is an effect of Patriarchy, that perpetuates myths about human sexuality.
The people that defend heterosexual, violent, misogynist porn so vehemently conveniently forget that it is the context that matters, not the act. That by making, distributing, and viewing porn, you are, in effect, participating in a major tenet of women’s oppression. Mainstream porn is racist, sexist and homophobic.
Lets not forget the whole “lesbian porn for men” thing, the “black man does white woman” thing, the “women being raped by a group of men” porn. And this is mainstream. 90% of men (and some women) have seen some porn in their lifetime.
No matter how much I rail against porn, there is always going to be people that say I’m wrong, that I’m a prude, that feminists have no sense of humour. Well, sorry, but the truth of the matter is that porn is a symptom of oppression, simple as.




Yes, love this post (and thanks for rescuing my comment on the other thread
)
Sometimes I think “prude” is the analog of “slut”. A “prude” is a woman who is judged as not sexual enough. A “slut” is a woman who is judged as too sexual. Neither of them have any concrete meaning, a “prude” can be a woman who refuses to do BDSM/a threesome or a woman who goes around telling other people that premarital sex is sinful, a “slut” can be a woman who is a porn star or a teenage girl who went through precocious puberty and has big breasts. Both of the words rely on the idea that there is one correct way of expressing sexuality (dictated by patriarchy of course).
By: littoralmermaid on July 27, 2007
at 12:23 am
“No matter how much I rail against porn, there is always going to be people that say I’m wrong, that I’m a prude, that feminists have no sense of humour.”
I know. What also bothers me is when people say there are more important issues to be dealing with than those affecting women. I still think it’s the case that unless it’s something men are negatively affected by, that something is dismissed and action to tackle it is slow-coming.
By: Michelle on July 27, 2007
at 6:42 pm
I think porn is a major issue that affects women.
Porn is everywhere nowadays & its a hell of a lot more extreme & degrading than it was 15 years ago.
Porn does have a negative impact on how men view women,the content of porn is all about the mens pleasure with the women being coerced into ever more painful & degrading sexual acts for the sexual gratification of men.
Most of porns consumers are men,most of porns victims are women.
Most women have no idea of the content of todays porn,ignorance is bliss for the pornographers,it means that they can produce more & more extreme porn with little audible protest.
I cant understand why men call women prudes or feminists for being against porn,i’m male,against porn & certainly no prude,so what does that make me?
I was a heavy porn user up until 7 months ago,ive kicked the ‘habit’ but it wasnt easy,in fact part of the reason i gave up porn was because of the porn itself becoming too extreme.
To sum it up,if i was female & had seen what i have seen over the last 15 years i would be very concerned about the porn readily available nowadays.
By: Dave on July 30, 2007
at 11:37 am
Porn is a major issue affecting women.
In the last 15 years porn has become more pervasive & much,much more extreme.
Nowadays porn isnt about sex,its about the degradation & dehuminisation of women through extreme & painful sexual acts for the gratification of its primarily male viewers.
Women in porn are verbally abused & tossed around like pieces of meat to be multiply penetrated,slapped,choked,whatever the pornographers desire,the women are told to grin & bear it,so porns consumers think women love being treated this way!
This cant fail to have a negative impact on how men view women.
Porn should be a womens issue because quite frankly although women are not the main consumers of porn,they will suffer the consequences of it.
If i was a woman,feminist or not,i would be very concerned about porn,ignorance is bliss for the pornographers,little or no audible protest gives the green light to pornographers to make even more extreme porn,if thats possible!
By: Dave on July 31, 2007
at 4:07 pm
Yep, the word “prude” is laughable. I used it to show that people always go back to base terms when they don’t agree with something and don’t have any original arguments. Women get called all kinds of things, mostly animalistic terms (bitch, cow, etc) or gender specific terms (cunt, whore, slag etc).
And yes, when I want women’s problems to be taken seriously, there is always someone standing by saying “but this is more important!”. There are issues that I also care about, such as ecology, global warming, poverty and so on, but I also give a crap about women, because I am one, we are women and we live in a world set up for men.
I think that people that don’t agree with feminism somehow expect feminism to be the ONLY thing that we care about. It’s what we focus on more often – there are plenty of people that care about those things they think we “should” be focusing on.
ps. Littoral mermaid, i can’t access your site, is everything okay?
By: Liz on August 1, 2007
at 2:28 pm
Liz-
Eep, I pulled my blog offline temporarily because of an annoying mini-flamewar last week. It’ll be back in a few days (with some new content too) and I’ll try to e-mail you and some of my other regular readers when it’s back up.
Oh yes, I think that the “Why don’t you care about ….” is one of the biggest strawfeminists ever! I am curious if people go around and say to other activists, “Why do you care about the environment/poverty/racism, feminism is more important?” (Not that I think that they should, but an interesting thought). I’m also curious if other liberation movements get the “what about the menz” equivalent. I doubt it.
By: littoralmermaid on August 1, 2007
at 3:26 pm
I’ve been researching radical feminism lately. I don’t self-identify as one… yet… but I sure have a lot in common with those whose blogs I’ve read. I’ve been learning about 1st wave 3rd Wave etc.
Anyway the anti-porn stance is one that I’m working on reconciling with my somewhat libertarian (not icky conservative gun-nut libertarian but, more anti-regulation, unschooling libertarian) worldview. I don’t use porn myself, but I hesitate to tell anyone else that they should or shouldn’t…
This quote of yours has helped me the most of any I’ve read so far, in understanding the anti-porn perspective.
“The people that defend heterosexual, violent, misogynist porn so vehemently conveniently forget that it is the context that matters, not the act. That by making, distributing, and viewing porn, you are, in effect, participating in a major tenet of women’s oppression. Mainstream porn is racist, sexist and homophobic.”
Thank you,
AJ
By: BannaOj on August 8, 2007
at 10:51 pm